Tuesday 11 August 2026Vol. VI
Community consultation meeting outside a mining project office
Governance

Permitting timelines are lengthening, and consultation quality is the reason worth defending

Developers complain about delay. The delays that actually stick are the ones caused by consultation that was skipped and has to be redone.

By Sofia Andrade & Fenella Osei

Every jurisdiction reports longer approval cycles and most attribute it to bureaucratic capacity. The case files suggest something more specific: a large share of the lost time is spent redoing consultation that was treated as a formality.

The pattern

A project consults late, receives an objection it cannot answer, and then spends two years negotiating what six months of early engagement would have settled.

What good looks like

Published minutes, identifiable representatives, grievance mechanisms with response times, and a record of what changed in the plan as a result.

Sofia Andrade
Latin America Mining Correspondent

Sofia is a Latin America mining correspondent covering permitting, community consultation and informal production in the Andean belt.

Fenella Osei
Commodities Correspondent, Mine Supply

Fenella is a commodities correspondent covering mine supply, cost curves and producer disclosure across Africa, Australia and the Americas.